Libya. The Heist of the Century

0
1
Libya is the heist-‘hold-up ‘highway-robbery of the century !
International Lawyer explains: «Now, Total can pump everything it wants in Libya without the French government knowing, by the way …
It could very well tell the French government that daily 100 tons of crude are extracted, when it extracts 1000, and 900 tonnes difference can go under the guise of companies based in the Virgin Islands.
Libya is the heist of the century! Here are some figures …
Amount of U.S. debt with regard to Libya for deliveries of oils made and not paid: $ 45 billion. Amount blocked in bank accounts in the United States assets: $ 36 billion. Amount of frozen Libyan investments in the United States: $ 133 billion.
You also have sums for Libya that were at the Bank of France, London, Geneva, Brussels and Vienna, in the accounts of central banks, everything was frozen … You had more than 88 tons of gold Libyan banks in member countries of the European Union …
That’s the heist of the century, no?»
«Here is an interview without waffling again.
Marcel Ceccaldi was the French lawyer of the Libyan State until the fall of the regime. Lawyer of Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, the Gaddafi family and several former Libyan ministers, Marcel Ceccaldi back on the Libyan cases in the news and it explains why the fall of Tripoli has implications for the French and global geopolitics.Marcel Ceccaldi also counsel African leaders. This is a great connoisseur of official and secret policies in Africa and the Arab world. He denounced the secret role of Qatar in the Arab revolutions and the consequences that could fall tomorrow Damascus on peace in the West …This interview with Marcel Ceccaldi helps to understand how the public is manipulated and it also highlights the irresponsibility of politicians who speak unabashedly about topics they do not absolutely familiar … Marcel Ceccaldi was invited by Yannick Urrien Wednesday, June 26, 2013 on 91.5 FM Kernews.Kernews: The French begin to be interested in the Libyan case. Two years ago, we were told it was an intervention against an evil Arab dictator and everything was fine. A year later, it was found that the Libyans had never been so miserable. We went to this account that the development of Islamic terrorism in Africa is the result of this war … Do you feel that the spirits begin to open on this?Marcel Ceccaldi: Things are beginning to change, albeit slowly, because when the military intervention by NATO in Libya, there was a real propaganda mega hit that international public opinion, especially French, to which is explained in a very simple way, it was the struggle of good — that is to say the insurgents — against evil — that the institutions of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. It is now realized that the causes and consequences of armed intervention remain to be written. The causes are beginning to write, and the consequences it begins to finger: the French intervention in Mali, Libya, which has become the haven for Islamist groups are on Libyan territory the possibility of reconstituting forces, and behind the funding of these organizations, there is Qatar where our President has just visited.

Finally, we can thank Bernard-Henri Levy, who was the initiator of the attack!

I would say thank you to the single thought … I remember that when the military intervention by NATO, the posture of France, one adopted by Nicolas Sarkozy, whose motives remain unclear, was supported by the Socialist Party. It is in a curious position. The Ambassador of France to the current Security Council — it has not changed — is now on the same line as the previous government. We try to introduce ourselves Libya as a state that is liberated from dictatorial while at the same time, if you look on the website of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs under «Travel», you will see that Libya is classified in the red zone, while it was not before.

We can draw a parallel with what happened in Iraq …

Course. So to get to the heart of the Libyan business, because it is from there that the truth begins to speak in terms of public opinion, it is financial issues between Libya and the period Sarkozy. The best way to remove all doubts on the matter, because it is in honor of the men who are challenged — I think everything that has been said about Claude Gueant and funding campaign Nicolas Sarkozy, but it is mostly the image that France gives itself out — the best way is to hear the most suitable to explain the issue people. But these people are all subject of a Red Notice issued by Interpol at the time, was led by a Texan and these people can not come and explain in France. If they were in France, under the Red Notice issued by Interpol at the request of the current Libya, they would be immediately arrested.

Or, if you want to shed light on all of these cases, as a sovereign state is never required to execute orders for provisional arrest issued by Interpol, it is sufficient that France refuses to perform these orders. There would be many reasons to do it … For example, in Libya, arbitrary detentions are common, violations of rights of persons are commonplace. Just refer all reports of international organizations recognized as Amnesty International, Human Rights or the International League of Human Rights competence … If France agrees to execute orders for provisional arrest issued by Interpol it simply means that the current authorities deny that the whole truth comes out about the financial relationships that have existed between France and Libya …

France is she not obliged to submit to the demands of Interpol?

No, all current Libyan leaders have dual citizenship with the United States, Britain and Qatar … The United States, Britain and Qatar at the time, have never agreed to execute the provisional arrest warrants issued by Interpol at the request of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya. All this for a very simple reason: Interpol is a wide status, but it is not a treaty. This is not France who joined Interpol is a governmental authority which has requested that police be integrated into Interpol. This is a police practice, Interpol Red Notices are only police practice, and they have no legal force in law as such. This police practice does not commit the France as a sovereign state. Besides, these people are for the most part currently on the territories and the Interpol member states refused to execute orders for provisional arrest states.

So France can do very well. I can even say that if France agreed to execute an order for provisional arrest issued by Interpol at the request of the current Libya, it would violate its international commitments. Indeed, it has signed the convention against torture and inhuman treatment — this is what happens every day in Libya — has signed the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, it has signed the Universal Covenant rights rights and has signed all major resolutions of the General Assembly of the United Nations on the rights of the human person.

There is the matter of funding, but there is also the mandate of the UN to intervene in Libya, or rather to kill Gaddafi and overthrow his regime … What about in terms of international law?

There has never been a mandate of the Security Council of the UN allowing members of the military coalition of NATO to intervene as they did in Libya. This is obvious. There was a no-fly zone. Member states of NATO had no mandate to bomb as they did and to take sides in an internal conflict as they did. The practical result is that now, Islamist militias are in control of Libya. This is somewhat ironic because, according to some sources, the French hostages after French offensive in Mali, have been transferred and detained in Libya. And we continue to have such relations with a country on whose territory the French hostages were taken by armed Islamist groups!

Is there a legal action going on this intervention outside the UN mandate?

No, because the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya has disappeared. At the time, we were going to the Court of Justice of the African Union on the illegality of the military intervention by NATO, but the fall of Tripoli has not allowed us to complete this action until his term.

This means that the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya is not a recognized entity …

The Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, as an institution no longer exists. You have a Libyan opposition. Everyone talks about 2 million Syrian refugees, Syria is more than 20 million people … Since the fall of Tripoli, you have 1.6 million Libyans who have fled abroad, out of a population total of 6.4 million. You have over a quarter of the Libyan people who fled Libya since the fall of Tripoli. This number is sufficient to demonstrate to the authorities of the dramatic consequences of the military intervention by NATO.

Chadian President summed it in an interview with Le Figaro June 8: he explained that when the war broke out in Libya, all African leaders knew in advance the consequences of this intervention on the West Africa and Libya itself. This all-in-fact was clear that acting as they did, the NATO member states have only precipitate the disorder in West Africa by creating a pole mounting Islamist groups in which we find Qatar as funder. Everyone knows that the Islamic Red Crescent Qatar was installed in northern Mali and, alongside its humanitarian actions, financed Islamist groups who seized the north of Mali.

There is much talk of the return of Nicolas Sarkozy in four years. This case can it prevent it from being run again?

Impostures die hard. Just that the truth and I think we will not talk about it back. Let’s be clear, when I talk about deception, the French intervention in Mali, what was the cause? These were the consequences of the French intervention in Libya. Who is accountable now, French soldiers who fell in Mali and those who may fall in the weeks or months to come? Who is accountable for the victims of the attacks almost daily in Mali or Niger, if not the one who took the initiative to engage France in a company that was not in the general interest of France …

The self-righteousness and political correctness are also accountable for all …

This is outstanding! The fall of Tripoli, it was early September 2011. We are in 2013, it took two years for that little by little, the truth begins to emerge.

Are we going to repeat the same mistake with Syria?

This is exactly the same! Do you really think that the Arab Spring was called corresponded to a spontaneous movement? Do you think it is trivial at the same time bursting events in Tunisia and the rebellion in Benghazi has always been an Islamist stronghold? The Chief MUJAO (Movement for the uniqueness and jihad in West Africa) who was killed in northern Mali was serving as Consul General of Mali in Saudi Arabia. He resigned, and that nobody knows is that it then went to Benghazi where he remained for two to three years before joining Pakistan, and then he was to take up arms in the north Mali. So you have a company that has been conducted for a long time. At the same time, you Southern Tunisia, Libya and Syria …

When we hear about the delivery of weapons to the Syrian rebels, it will have the effect of delivering weapons to jihadist groups that recruit, not only in Syria but across the Middle East, Africa, and especially across the European continent … So we are directly affected. As long as we agree to let a maker of war countries like Qatar, we will go to great difficulties. It speaks to us today in France researching savings from the state and the abandonment of tax loopholes, but bad habits die hard … Three weeks after his election, Nicolas Sarkozy received the Emir of Qatar. Three weeks after his election, Francois Hollande has received the Prime Minister of Qatar … But the privileged tax treaty between France and Qatar she was repealed by the socialist government?

Absolutely not …

Absolutely not: so that the investments of a maker of war State France enjoys a privileged tax! Critical interests of France are in danger if it works with a country like Qatar. Qatar, it’s nothing, it’s 160,000 nationals held under their boots 1.5 million foreigners who are practically in slavery. Passports are removed Filipinos, the Thai or Sri Lankan working there! Well, the French government agreed that the participation of Qatar in total from 5 to 15%. However, nobody has spoken!

These are extremely serious business, but the French are beginning to open their eyes …

Yes, that is why we must not stop to report this fact. This is contrary to the interests of France. Whenever it undermines the interests of France, it affects the interests of the French, even if they do not merge with the interests of France. In this case, prejudice the interests of France, which is adversely affecting the interests of the French, in which great efforts we now demand.

Finally, a word about the current situation in Libya seems to be a gigantic chaos …

It’s chaos. We do not know the number of people who are arbitrarily detained … We do not know the number of people missing … You have entire cities that have been emptied of their population … The black Libyans are being persecuted on the grounds that if they were mercenaries of Gaddafi, while 35% of the Libyan population is black. The chief of staff of the Libyan army, who was killed along with Gaddafi was black … African migrants are subject to plunder and totally unacceptable violence and you have authorities whose authority s’ stops at the steps of the building where they are cut off.

Many testimonies are also reports of torture against sub-Saharan migrants who arrive in Libya …

I refer to the report of the International Federation of Human Rights and all this takes place in the general indifference. All this because the media do not carry these items of information. They talk about democracy, but Qatar is a country where a poet who dared to criticize the Emir, was sentenced to life imprisonment.

We’re talking about a country, Libya, where, two years ago, nobody was starving …

Not only no one was starving, but there was also a social protection system that had no equivalent in Africa. Education was free, all health care is free, the Libyans who did not work were entitled to a government donation, the newlyweds were entitled to an apartment, etc.. Now it is total chaos, because this procedure allows oil companies to make profits they could not make time Gaddafi.

Now, Total can pump everything he wants in Libya without the French government know, by the way … It could very well tell the French government that daily 100 tons of crude extract, when he goes extract 1000, and 900 tonnes of difference can go under the guise of companies based in the Virgin Islands. Libya is the heist of the century! Here are some figures …

Amount of U.S. debt with regard to Libya for deliveries of oils made and not paid: $ 45 billion.

Amount blocked in bank accounts in the United States assets: $ 36 billion.

Amount of frozen Libyan investments in the United States: $ 133 billion.

You also have sums of Libya who were at the Bank of France, London, Geneva, Brussels and Vienna, in the accounts of central banks, everything was frozen … You were more than 88 tons of gold Libyan banks in member countries of the European Union … That’s the heist of the century, right?

Yannick Urien for Kernews»